# Quickstart#

Fortuna offers three different usage modes: From uncertainty estimates, From model outputs and From Flax models. These serve users according to the constraints dictated by their own applications. Their pipelines are depicted in the following figure, each starting from one of the green panels.

The following sections offer a glance over each of the usage modes. See Usage modes for more details.

## From uncertainty estimates#

Starting from uncertainty estimates has minimal compatibility requirements and it is the quickest level of interaction with the library. This usage mode offers conformal prediction methods for both classification and regression. These take uncertainty estimates in input, and return rigorous sets of predictions that retain a user-given level of probability. In one-dimensional regression tasks, conformal sets may be thought as calibrated versions of confidence or credible intervals.

Mind that if the uncertainty estimates that you provide in inputs are inaccurate, conformal sets might be large and unusable. For this reason, if your application allows it, please consider the From model outputs and From Flax models usage modes.

**Example.** Suppose you want to calibrate credible intervals with coverage error `error`

,
each corresponding to a different test input variable.
We assume that credible intervals are passed as arrays of lower and upper bounds,
respectively `test_lower_bounds`

and `test_upper_bounds`

.
You also have lower and upper bounds of credible intervals computed for several validation inputs,
respectively `val_lower_bounds`

and `val_upper_bounds`

.
The corresponding array of validation targets is denoted by `val_targets`

.
The following code produces *conformal prediction intervals*,
i.e. calibrated versions of you test credible intervals.

```
from fortuna.conformal import QuantileConformalRegressor
conformal_intervals = QuantileConformalRegressor().conformal_interval(
val_lower_bounds=val_lower_bounds, val_upper_bounds=val_upper_bounds,
test_lower_bounds=test_lower_bounds, test_upper_bounds=test_upper_bounds,
val_targets=val_targets, error=error)
```

## From model outputs#

Starting from model outputs assumes you have already trained a model in some framework,
and arrive to Fortuna with model outputs in `numpy.ndarray`

format for each input data point.
This usage mode allows you to calibrate your model outputs, estimate uncertainty,
compute metrics and obtain conformal sets.

Compared to the From uncertainty estimates usage mode, this one offers better control, as it can make sure uncertainty estimates have been appropriately calibrated. However, if the model had been trained with classical methods, the resulting quantification of model (a.k.a. epistemic) uncertainty may be poor. To mitigate this problem, please consider the From Flax models usage mode.

**Example.**
Suppose you have calibration and test model outputs,
respectively `calib_outputs`

and `test_outputs`

.
Furthermore, you have some arrays of calibration target variables `calib_targets`

.
The following code provides a minimal classification example to get calibrated predictive entropy estimates.

```
from fortuna.output_calib_model import OutputCalibClassifier
calib_model = OutputCalibClassifier()
status = calib_model.calibrate(calib_outputs=calib_outputs, calib_targets=calib_targets)
test_entropies = calib_model.predictive.entropy(outputs=test_outputs)
```

## From Flax models#

Starting from Flax models has higher compatibility requirements than the From uncertainty estimates and From model outputs usage modes, as it requires deep learning models written in Flax. However, it enables you to replace standard model training with scalable Bayesian inference procedures, which may significantly improve the quantification of predictive uncertainty.

**Example.** Suppose you have a Flax classification deep learning model `model`

from inputs to logits, with output
dimension given by `output_dim`

. Furthermore,
you have some training, validation and calibration TensorFlow data loader `train_data_loader`

, `val_data_loader`

and `test_data_loader`

, respectively.
The following code provides a minimal classification example to get calibrated probability estimates.

```
from fortuna.data import DataLoader
train_data_loader = DataLoader.from_tensorflow_data_loader(train_data_loader)
calib_data_loader = DataLoader.from_tensorflow_data_loader(val_data_loader)
test_data_loader = DataLoader.from_tensorflow_data_loader(test_data_loader)
from fortuna.prob_model import ProbClassifier
prob_model = ProbClassifier(model=model)
status = prob_model.train(train_data_loader=train_data_loader, calib_data_loader=calib_data_loader)
test_means = prob_model.predictive.mean(inputs_loader=test_data_loader.to_inputs_loader())
```